謝謝一位好心人提醒我：切忌把「搞」字寫成「攪」字。「攪」字含蓄意顛覆之意。近日有關名牌、藝術與消費的展覽、評論與行動在香港的社會脈絡下引起一定程度的社會關注。這些是搞作？攪攪震？還是「惡攪」?It is a hot topic to talk about branding, art and consumption under the context of Hong Kong. Here are some information for your reference.

1. 展覽：「路易威登：創意情感」Exhibition : “Louis Vuitton: A Passion for Creation" Hong Kong Museum of Art

圖片來自http://www.hkreporter.com

Exhibition : “Louis Vuitton: A Passion for Creation"

Hong Kong Museum of Art Now-9/8

香港藝術館尖沙咀梳士巴利道10號

Hong Kong Museum of Art, 10 Salisbury Rd,Tsim Sha Tsui

3. 展覽 New Exhibition：ZEVS Hong Kong Liquidated Logo

Now-30/9, Art Statements Gallery

Mon-Fri 11:00 – 19:00, Sat 11:00 – 17:00

中環美輪街5號地下

5 Mee Lun Street, Central 

Tel: 2122 9657

2. 社會與文化界對香港美術館展覽「路易威登：創意情感」的回應

包括何慶基、劉建華、程展緯、小西等評論文章與連串行動紀錄片請瀏覽For the response from civil society (criticism and documentary film from Oscar Ho, Jasper Lau, Luke, Tiny West…etc) to the LV exhibition in HK Museum of Art, please visit： 

*香港藝術搜索頻道

Hong Kong Art Discovery Channel  http://hkadc.blogspot.com/

獨立媒體In Media  http://www.inmediahk.net

*註：香港藝術探索頻道(Hong Kong Art Discovery Channel)，簡稱HKADC，民間發起的另一個HKADC組織。於2009年2月10日成立，並於2月20日正式投入服務，旨在發放香港最新藝術新聞資訊。Remarks: Hong Kong Art Discovery Channel, another HKADC solely organized by the people from civil society. Opening Air since February, 20, 2009, HKADC is aiming at releasing Hong Kong Art News.

在Art Statements踫上正在展覽的法國藝術家ZEVS，便詢問他上月在中環遮打大廈外牆塗畫滴流Chanel 商標的行為藝術，而被名店追討因塗畫外牆引致損毀數百萬元的賠償一事。他強調外牆並無損毀，因為滴流Chanel本身使用了大標貼與易清洗的黑色顏料，故不會造成永久性損毀。他原來在這幾年己不斷在巴黎、柏林、紐約等大城市進行同樣的行為藝術，希望令市民反思廣告與名牌對城市人生活的影響。但被告上法庭，也只是這唯一一次。

When I met ZEVS in Art Statements last week, I asked about the performance Liquidated Chanel Logo on Chater House in Central last month. He was claimed millions dollars due to the performance damaged a wall of Chater House. He explained that he used only a big sticker and water paint to do a performance, Every precaution was taken in order to wash the paint very easily and swiftly. He has shown already this liquidated Chanel in public spaces in Berlin, Berlin, New York to question how advertisement of global branding dominates our lives. However, this is the first time he was sued in Hong Kong.